email from white house

Mar 2009
307
0
why you asking b ?
The White House, Washington





Dear Jim:




Thank you for taking the time to write. I have heard from many Americans regarding firearms policy and gun violence in our Nation, and I appreciate your perspective. From Aurora to Newtown to the streets of Chicago, we have seen the devastating effects gun violence has on our American family. I join countless others in grieving for all those whose lives have been taken too soon by gun violence.



Like the majority of Americans, I believe the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. In this country, we have a strong tradition of gun ownership that has been handed down from generation to generation. Hunting and sport shooting are part of our national heritage. Yet, even as we acknowledge that almost all gun owners in America are responsible, when we look at the devastation caused by gun violence—whether in high-profile tragedies or the daily heartbreak that plagues our cities—we must ask ourselves whether we are doing enough.



While reducing gun violence is a complicated challenge, protecting our children from harm should not be a divisive one. Most gun owners agree that we can respect the Second Amendment while keeping an irresponsible, law-breaking few from inflicting harm on a massive scale. Most also agree that if we took commonsense steps to curtail gun violence, there would be fewer atrocities like the one that occurred in Newtown. We will not be able to stop every violent act, but if there is even one thing we can do to reduce gun violence—if even one life can be saved—then we have an obligation to try.



That is why I asked Vice President Joe Biden to identify concrete steps we can take to keep our children safe, help prevent mass shootings, and reduce the broader epidemic of gun violence in this country. He met with over 200 groups representing a broad cross-section of Americans and heard their best ideas. I have put forward a specific set of proposals based off of his efforts, and in the days ahead, I intend to use whatever weight this office holds to make them a reality.



My plan gives law enforcement, schools, mental health professionals, and the public health community some of the tools they need to help reduce gun violence. These tools include strengthening the background check system, helping schools hire more resource officers and counselors and develop emergency preparedness plans, and ensuring mental health professionals know their options for reporting threats of violence. And I directed the Centers for Disease Control to study the best ways to reduce gun violence—because it is critical that we understand the science behind this public health crisis.



As important as these steps are, they are not a substitute for action from Congress. To make a real and lasting difference, members of Congress must also act. As part of my comprehensive plan, I have called on them to pass some specific proposals right away. First, it is time to require a universal background check for anyone trying to buy a gun. Second, Congress should renew the 10-round limit on magazines and reinstate and strengthen the assault weapons ban. We should get tougher on those who buy guns with the purpose of selling them to criminals, and we should impose serious punishments on anyone who helps them do this.



These are reasonable, commonsense measures that have the support of the majority of the American people. But change will not come unless the American people demand it from their lawmakers. Now is the time to do the right thing for our children, our communities, and the country we love. We owe the victims of heartbreaking national tragedies and the countless unheralded tragedies each year nothing less than our best effort—to seek consensus in order to save lives and ensure a brighter future for our children.



Thank you, again, for writing. I encourage you to visit Now is the time | The White House to learn more about my Administration’s approach.


Sincerely,


Barack Obama
 
Jan 2009
1,684
0
s. greenlake *****
you know....


that's such bullshit.


If you read that carefully.. he's placating in the first couple paragraphs.. then he frames up gun owners as hunters and sport shooters (ignoring personal protection)

Then he builds the case for a huge problem (violence) andstates that most gun owners agree with him that he should do something..


THEN HE PASSES THE ******* BUCK TO JOE BIDEN?


If your so goddamn passionate mr president, why don't you do us a favor and take it on yourself??????


Nah.............. no scapegoat if it all falls flat. Now he can blame joe for the misguided attempts to disarm.


I really really hate politicians.
 
Feb 2013
212
0
Puyallup, Wa
Instead of reducing gun violence it's about saving the children. And we're unreasonable and don't have common sense because we don't want universal background checks and ten round magazines.
 
Mar 2009
307
0
why you asking b ?
Yea he is a ******* joke, I love words like SPECIFIC but dont actually state anything, also I have directed blah blah blah,, blame shifting already, I cant wait til he gooone
 
Dec 2010
305
0
Fall City
Ya, but the scary part is he is planning on dry ******* us every day until he is out of office!

I inserted an Obama proof butt plug... Meaning I now drink a lot of beer shoot guns when I want and have stopped watching the news :lol:
 
Jan 2009
845
0
Renton, WA
Why is it always referred to as 'GUN violence'? Why not just violence? "XX people were killed by guns..." Really? So these guns, being inanimate objects and all, just got up all on their own, pulled their own triggers and killed people with no human intervention whatsoever? There wasn't a PERSON holding that gun, a PERSON pulling that trigger? Didn't another PERSON murder someone? No, apparently the GUN murdered someone all by itself. :rolleyes:

Drives me ******* nuts, because it's a very obvious and pathetic ploy to frame the discussion in such a way as to blame the tool a PERSON uses to kill another person, and ignores that fact that PEOPLE have been killing PEOPLE as long has man has been kicking around on this planet. The tool is largely irrelevant, the problem is why are people killing each other?

And if we're going to have a supposedly "rational" discussion about "gun violence", wouldn't it make sense to take a closer look at *where* that gun violence was happening, and to whom? It's not happening in urban areas with very high gun ownership per capita, it's happening in big inner cities, and much of it is gang on gang violence, and the innocents caught in their crossfire. Oh and those big inner cities tend to have the strictest gun control in the country. So yeah, how is that working out? :banghead:
 
Jan 2013
123
0
Silverton, OR
I got the same thing I think they just want me to know they know I know they are watching me.
 
Top