Very Concealable .357 Magnum

Never seen it. Hang on tight.

richardlpalmer said:

I'm wondering if the under barrel would lend itself to pushing back toward the palm rather than "up", effectively reducing muzzle rise.

Click to expand...

Well from what I've read about it, that's exactly what it does, so felt recoil (and especially muzzle rise) is less than a 'normal' comparable revolver.

It's still a .357 Mag in a small revolver, so 'hang on tight' indeed.

They would be awesome, but have suffered from a reputation for not-so-great reliability, and crappy DA triggers.

If they fixed that, I could see myself owning one of their 4-5" models.

The trigger is what turned me off. Too complicated and susceptible to failure OMHO.

BLdtylry said:

Click to expand...

OMFG! Who are they KIDDING? That's an accident waiting to blow up in someone's face. Meh... the Judge or nothin.

thanks for the info though, it was interesting seeing the inner-workings of that gun.

It certainly is.....er.... interesting looking.

If I were in the market for a concealable .357/38, I'd most likely snag a Smith PD360. In fact... I think I will after I get the Kimber..

Before everyone condemns the Rhino for being 'too complicated', have you looked inside any other popular revolvers lately? Here's a classic Smith & Wesson:




Looks just about as complicated as the Rhino to me? **** is just in different places because of the Rhino's unique design. Just sayin...

Gixxer.. I was thinking the same.... I own several Smiths and it looked very similiar to any one of mine... except the firing pin location...

richardlpalmer said:

Saw this today and it caught my eye. Interesting what they did with the cylinder shape & location of the barel. Might not be new to you kids, though...

Click to expand...

Cool pistol but I'll take the Judge anyday. :rock: Now THAT'S a pistol!! :top: