Why Isn't the NRA Defending Ferguson’s Blacks?
That is the headline of this story:
Why Isn
"
The National Rifle Association has been warning us about the threat of a heavily-armed and dangerous government crushing dissent for decades...
...somehow, the NRA seems to have missed the whole thing with the SWAT teams and the tank-like vehicles and the snipers and the LRAD sound cannon and the tear gas and the rubber bullets being trained on unarmed Americans. Not a peep from LaPierre on this extended assault on citizens of Ferguson, at least that I can find.
"
What do you guys think about this? I have my opinions, and the initial question they ask in the title is leaning and slanted, but I am curious why you guys think the NRA hasn't had much to say.
That is the headline of this story:
Why Isn
"
The National Rifle Association has been warning us about the threat of a heavily-armed and dangerous government crushing dissent for decades...
...somehow, the NRA seems to have missed the whole thing with the SWAT teams and the tank-like vehicles and the snipers and the LRAD sound cannon and the tear gas and the rubber bullets being trained on unarmed Americans. Not a peep from LaPierre on this extended assault on citizens of Ferguson, at least that I can find.
"
What do you guys think about this? I have my opinions, and the initial question they ask in the title is leaning and slanted, but I am curious why you guys think the NRA hasn't had much to say.