PNW Guns Forum
Go Back   PNW Guns > Gun Forum > Pistols

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2011, 06:39 PM   #1
Rifleman
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Seattle
Posts: 211
Dilema

Well I'm selling my Glock 21 and my Ruger P90 I have sellers for both .45 is just getting too expensive to shoot so Im thinking of picking up a nice Walther P99 those things shoot like butter, but I'm at the point where I dont know ehther to get it in .40 or 9mm.. I like both calibers, 9mm has a little less snap to it so I think I would be able to put more rounds down range accuractley with the 9 since I wouldn't have to compensate for the snap every shot..Ithers I know who have been hit with the above rounds saya 9mm is going to kill ya just as well as a .40 it's all about sow plamet.. Which is true, 9mm is about $9-10 per box .40 is about $12 so the price difference isn't big at all I just can't decidde on teh calivers...siggestopms,
 
Join PNW Guns


Welcome to PNW Guns, a gun and firearm community for gun owners in the Pacific Northwest. We welcome everyone and the community is free to join so register today and become part of the PNW Guns family!


Old 07-01-2011, 07:21 PM   #2
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Woodinville WA
Posts: 255
If money is an issue, there is no substitute for 9mm. It's the cheapest serious round out there. Walmart just raised their price for federal FMJ from $10 to $12.50 for 50 rounds. I expect 40 to go from 15 to $17. I've never seen it for $12. Let me know where you buy your ammo! 9mm is about 2/3rds the price everywhere I go. per box doesn't sound so bad, but $100 spent on 9mm requires $150 for 40 cal.

And yeah, only a 150 or so FPS difference between a 357 mag and a 9mm. Almost identical bullet weight and size. Get a good defense round and a 9 is great. Still less impact than a bullet with "4" at the front of it, but "stopping power" isn't about getting hit with a sledgehammer. It's about rippin' the crap out of the innards of the mofo getting hit. Hate to be that graphic, but it's true.

Make sure you try out an M&P, they make 'em in 9 and 40. If it's a range gun, try out the Long version. Halfway to a limited IDPA gun with one of those!
 
Old 07-01-2011, 09:06 PM   #3
Rifleman
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Seattle
Posts: 211
I feel you on prices, back in 2007 I could buy a 50 round box of .45 for 7.99 man if i could invent a time machine and just buy 10 grand worth I'd be a rich man now.. I'll have to look at the .40 to see where i got it, I got it a few months ago which is a reason it may have been cheaper but I normally go to www.ammmunitiontogo.com or AIM Surplus Home there's a list of companies out there that'll give C&R holders wholesale price on stuff but Ive yet to use any of em, I know right now you can get 1,000 rounds of 9mm for the 180ish range,, My aunts neighbor is a big reloader has 2 or 3 automated reloading machines in his workshop so I'm going to see how much it'll cost me for him to build me up a stockpile.
 
Old 07-02-2011, 09:01 AM   #4
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: NW Quadrant WA State
Posts: 288
In general the cheapest firearms to shoot are those in a current or widely used Military Caliber.

For today's pistols that would be the 9mm. As for the lethality of a 9mm, it is a far better round today than it was when first introduced. Ammunition, specifically bullet design, makes it a better performer than when most of the articles were written and research performed.

Of the two I would get a 9mm. If you still have the urge for something bigger, consider one of the pistols chambered in .40 S&W that also allow you to change to an optional or aftermarket 9mm bbl. Sig P-229's are one such example where one can buy a .40 S&W, drop in a .357 Sig Barrel, or a Barsto 9mm barrel, and even a .22LR conversion. Practice and plink with the cheaper ammo, then change to the larger caliber if you feel the need for some "heavier artillery". Sig's can be a little more expensive but think of it as up to 4 calibers for waaaaay less than the price of 4 firearms. There are other firearms that will do this as well although some limit you to 2 or 3 choices rather than the 4 I illustrated.
 
Old 07-02-2011, 09:19 AM   #5
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Woodinville WA
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadshot2 View Post
Ammunition, specifically bullet design, makes it a better performer than when most of the articles were written and research performed.

If you still have the urge for something bigger, consider one of the pistols chambered in .40 S&W that also allow you to change to an optional or aftermarket 9mm bbl. Sig P-229's are one such example where one can buy a .40 S&W, drop in a .357 Sig Barrel, or a Barsto 9mm barrel, and even a .22LR conversion. Practice and plink with the cheaper ammo, then change to the larger caliber if you feel the need for some "heavier artillery". Sig's can be a little more expensive but think of it as up to 4 calibers for waaaaay less than the price of 4 firearms. There are other firearms that will do this as well although some limit you to 2 or 3 choices rather than the 4 I illustrated.
Yup on all of this. Most of the hate on 9mm is over 115gr ball/fmj ammo... Duh! Might as well stab someone with a chopstick! Seriously though, military ammo needs to change with these terrorists. The idea in organized "first world" warfare used to be to seriously injure dudes, because a dead guy takes two guys (one in pinch if you don't mind dragging him) to deal with. An injured guy requires a minimum of 3 (stretcher, medic, etc). With these jihadies the goal is extermination. They aren't being evaced behind lines for medical care, you know? Time to give the boys in uniform some "critical defense" rounds

Hell yeah on the conversion kits! They exist in 22 cal for a lot of glocks. The S&W M&P can go 40 and 9, if you buy the 40 to begin with. Kimber makes a 22 conversion for any "real" as in traditional 1911. I'm hoping with the popularity of the M&P that someone steps up with a 22 kit. Sooner rather than later. Though I do have a progressive reloader on the way.
 
Old 07-02-2011, 12:32 PM   #6
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: NW Quadrant WA State
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by philster View Post
Seriously though, military ammo needs to change with these terrorists.
It has. Rather than a .30 cal ball round, they're now "sniping" some of the al Q leaders with missiles from Predators.

Works for me.
 
Old 07-02-2011, 02:59 PM   #7
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Woodinville WA
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadshot2 View Post
It has. Rather than a .30 cal ball round, they're now "sniping" some of the al Q leaders with missiles from Predators.

Works for me.
Yeah, but I'd rather have the "through and throughs" from the ball turn into "Jeebus! Look at that hole!" on the rank and file with some advanced JHP.
 
Old 07-02-2011, 11:59 PM   #8
Rifleman
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Seattle
Posts: 211
Well I talked to a dealer today that sells on Gun broker but also sells locally, they offered me a NIB P99 in 9mm or in .40 S&W.. for $499 Which is a pretty damn good deal. So I'm down to flipping a coin, I went and shot the XD-9 and the Glock 22 a couple hours ago and the snap the .40 has me concerned, folks have told me it's not as bad on the Walthers due to their build quality and such, I've had cops tell me that both calibers are good, and either will take down the bad guy it's not necessarily about the caliber it's about the shooters ability to make the shots that count so I'm kind of leaning towards the .40 but with that being said the 9mm also a great gun.. Time to toss a coin I'm sure i'll be happy with what I get.
 
Old 07-03-2011, 11:43 AM   #9
Rifleman
 
Guff's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Bellevue
Posts: 151
I too was looking for a P99 9mm. The exact one I was looking for I couldn't get, and after reading a few more reviews ended up getting the PPQ in 9mm. Absolutely LOVE IT!!!

The first 15 shots out of it were in about a 3-4 inch grouping at aprox. 7 meters... which for me with a 9mm is incredible since I sucked with my brothers glock 19 at the same distance.

After tax it costed me just under $670. I picked it up last Saturday and have already put a little over 200 rounds through it... hopefully more today.

On another note, a buddy of mine has told me that he won't buy another .40 gun again (don't remember what he has specifically). He said that it has all the problems of the 9mm (snappy) with the problems of a .45 (push back). Maybe it's just the specific gun he has, but when it comes down to practicallity, why not get the gun with the cheaper ammo, which means more bullets fired at the range, which means better accuracy, esp when the critical defense rounds are more than lethal enough for self defense purposes?

Just my thoughts on it. Let us know what you get either way.
 
Old 07-03-2011, 05:32 PM   #10
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Woodinville WA
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerBarbarian View Post
the snap the .40 has me concerned, folks have told me it's not as bad on the Walthers due to their build quality and such, I've had cops tell me that both calibers are good, and either will take down the bad guy it's not necessarily about the caliber it's about the shooters ability to make the shots that count so I'm kind of leaning towards the .40 but with that being said the 9mm also a great gun.. Time to toss a coin I'm sure i'll be happy with what I get.
Walther build quality? Nah. Lots of us have had it with Walther Build quality

Handling recoil is down to a few things. The weight of the gun. The springs in the gun, and maybe the most important thing is how high the barrel sits in the gun. Some folks call it "bore axis" when they want to be fancy. The closer the center of the barrel sits down towards your hand, the more straight back the gun recoil. The higher the center of the barrel sits in the gun away from your hand, the more the front of the gun will tip upwards when you fire. So it's not that it kicks harder, we just feel it that way, because the gun moves more, and recovery from a fired shot takes longer. That's one reason an XD will feel like it has a bigger kick than an S&W M&P. The bore axis is incredibly high on an XD, and very low on an M&P. Glock is lower than an XD too. Doesn't mean the XD is not a GREAT gun! It clearly is, and every generation is better than the last!

Hopefully these pics of an XD and M&P will give you the idea. See how "tall" the XD sits over your hand? Let's face it. All these guns cost the same. $450 to $550. Don't go in with a preconceived idea. Check them all out and pick the gun that has the design features you dig the most, and shoots the best for you. In 9mm it matters less. In 40, I'd look for the lowest barrel axis, and reliability and customer service after purchase.


 
Old 07-04-2011, 04:01 PM   #11
Rifleman
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Seattle
Posts: 211
Already have an XD-9 bought it a couple years ago and love it. Fired the M&P and didn't like it too terribly much, I fired the P99 in 9mm and absolutely loved it and I've read quite a few reviews of it, I'm not a fan of S&W guns in general. I'm still up in the air, I'm selling my Glock 21 and I'm going to be selling my other .45 due to the ridicilious cost of .45 these days and downgrading the 9mm and .40.. If the cost wasn't as high I would get a Sig 229,
 
Old 07-04-2011, 05:04 PM   #12
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Woodinville WA
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerBarbarian View Post
If the cost wasn't as high I would get a Sig 229,
As I said, most of them cost about the same. Shoot em all and get the one that whispers in your ear! Sounds like it's the Walther all the way. I shot everything and it was the M&P. Over 600 rounds now, and yet to have any failures of any kind. I put 9 out of 10 in the black at 25 yards consistently and my vision SUCKS! I do great with all black sights, but with 3 dots, my eyes really have a hard time keeping my picture (front sight) clear. The gun shoots WAY better than me. But I've learned they all do

PS, Sig now has a "Certified Pre-owned" gun program. Read up on it, and see if it tickles your fancy. "CPO" 229s as they are called tend to run about $630 at Discount guns. Here's a couple examples. One black, one silver slide.

Sig 229R TT w/ NS CPO - 40 :: Sig Sauer :: Firearms - Handguns :: Discount Gun Sales LLC

Sig 229 CPO - 40 :: Sig Sauer :: Firearms - Handguns :: Discount Gun Sales LLC

I'm a sucker for the 226 myself over the 229. I dig the older smoother lines, and as much as I love polymer guns, all metal is in another league... If you're comfortable with what the factory does to bring them back to spec, it's only around a $100 difference to get your dream gun. And yeah, I know... "Only" $100 can buy a lot of ammo
 
Old 07-05-2011, 05:14 AM   #13
Marksman
 
Joined: May 2011
From: NW Quadrant WA State
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerBarbarian View Post
If the cost wasn't as high I would get a Sig 229,
Just exactly what constitutes "High Cost"?

For me, it isn't the money spent of a firearm that fits your hand and shooting style. High Cost is buying a pistol on the basis if price then finding out over time that you really don't like it, or it doesn't shoot well, only to end up selling or trading it eventually for the one you really wanted but turned down because of price.

If you find a pistol you like, and really would like to have, it makes more sense to save a few more dollars an get that one rather than settling for something less just because "you have to have it now".

Take it from someone who learned that lesson many years ago at great expense.

PS- My daily carry is a Sig P-229.
 
Reply

  PNW Guns > Gun Forum > Pistols


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Facebook @pnwguns PNW Guns RSS Feed

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2009 - 2010 PNW Guns. All rights reserved.