Which 1911? Here is some info....

Nov 2009
463
0
WA
10-8 Performance is one of the leaders in developing and refining the 1911 platform as a fighting weapon. As there have been several posts about budget 1911's lately, I thought I post up some info from their blog.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Choosing Your First 1911, Some Thoughts For the Beginner
A common question that I am asked is "What should I buy for my first 1911?" After they wade through a long dissertation that starts with "Get an M&P 45..." or the other one that starts with "Get a Glock 17...", we end up back at the original question. The statements I typically hear that preface the conversation include:

"I just want an entry level gun..."

"I don't want to spend too much..."

"It is just for the range..."
"I saw a great bargain from xxx brand, it has lots of cool looking features and looks like it is just as good as the guns from xxx big name brand which cost 3x as much."



If you really want a 1911, prepare to jump into the deep end of the pool. There is no dipping of the toe in the 1911 swimming pool, either dive all the way in or do not waste your time and money. There simply are no true bargains to be had, and the $3-400 gun that "looks just like" the big name brand gun is just that - a lookalike only. If you only fire a few hundred rounds a year out of the gun at 7 yards, then you may be very happy with whatever you buy. However, should you ever decide to use the gun for a training class or any other serious applications, be prepared for that gun to let you down at some point.

There is a reason the big name 1911s cost what they do, and it is not just some voodoo to line the pockets of their manufacturers. It is a very expensive proposition to make the 1911, and savings are only had when you cut corners somewhere. These corners are typically cut by using less expensive small parts and skipping fitting operations. When Kimber came on the market in the 90's, they boasted match accuracy and custom features at production prices. Stop for a moment and look again at the cost saving steps outlined above. Kimber introduced the wide use of MIM small parts, which allow complex shapes to be made to close tolerances at a lower per part cost. Done properly, these parts can work well and last a long time. They brought CNC technology to the mix and were able to manufacture the slide, frame, and barrel to closer tolerances, reducing or eliminating the fitting required to improve accuracy. They did it right, and a new 1911 powerhouse was born. However, when they started looking to revisit the cost cutting steps is where they ended up stepping on it with their small parts quality and QC.

Why not buy a cheap import just to start out and learn the 1911? I would instead ask why you would want to just throw your money away. Instead of buying a gussied up cheapo that has no real hopes of growth, why not buy a low end no frills gun from a reputable manufacturer? My top picks for such a starter gun is the Springfield GI and Milspec 5" Government format guns, which can be had for around $5-600 if you shop around. For about $100 with smart shopping, you can also get one of the new manufacture Colt 1991A1 Government Models. Don't get one of the older ones from the 90's, it may or may not be a good deal if you don't know what to look for. If it turns out that you don't like the 1911 platform, a quality brand name gun will have enduring resale value, while the import knockoff will certainly not retain much value. If you end up falling in love with the 1911, then you can hang on to your quality brand gun and build on it. Spend the money once, and spend it well.
 
Jan 2010
472
0
Bend, Or.
Springfield makes great entry level/priced 1911's. One nice thing about them is that if you decide later that you want to make it "better" you can always send it off to a capable gunsmith and have them do the twice over. Springfield makes very high quality slides and frames which makes them a great base for any shooter, especially those new to 1911's.
 
Jan 2009
845
0
Renton, WA
I didn't get a 1911 for the longest time because the cost seemed prohibitive, at $1000+ minimum, where your typical Tupperware guns are $500-600. When I got serious about getting a 1911, I started considering some of the "entry level" guns in the $600 range, but after handling a bunch of 1911s, pretty quickly decided if I was finally going to get my first 1911, it was going to be a nice one.

I finally decided on a Kimber Eclipse Custom (as seen in my avatar), and couldn't be happier with it. It is the most accurate pistol I own. It is the easiest pistol to shoot well that I own. I dare say it makes me a better shooter. And it has been as reliable as my Glock or XDs.

So all that said, I'm a believer in getting a quality 1911 vs a cheap one. That doesn't mean you need to spend $1000+, there are some good solid 1911s for <$1000. Springfield & Kimber both have models in the $700ish range. The new Remington R1 (if you like old skool 1911s) is nice gun also in the $700 range. The Taurus 1911 has been getting good reviews and has a lot of features for the money, but if you handle one then handle a Springfield of Kimber etc, the difference is pretty obvious.

What I would avoid like the plague would be off-brand cheapo 1911s, you definitely get what you pay for. I'm glad I saved up and got the 1911 I really wanted. It's my favorite handgun after being a big fan of Glocks, XDs etc for years.
 
Jan 2009
1,684
0
s. greenlake *****
ha ha pete is a convert.

The other side of the coin is if your a tinker'er. I have a colt, that I love, and a kimber that I'm learning to love.

I have been shooting 1911's since I was 6 or 7. My dad has had MANY MANY over the years. He was always a tinkerer. As a machinist, and a novice gunsmith he's concocted so many 1911 mongrals it's comical. He's got boxes/buckets of parts, and enjoys the creation of something he can call his own, and that shoots pretty damn well.

I am also a tinker'er. I have 2 home protection guns that are in my eyes trustworthy, stock, and ready to rock. The rest are 'toys' for plinking/hunting/whatever. Just like everything else in my hobby world (bicycles, motorcycles, cars, boats etc) I have to **** with things...

The entry level 1911 is a GREAT platform to play with... take apart, learn.. (scratch the frame) figure out how all the safety's work.. sear springs.. bla bla bla.

Not to take anything away from a custom fitted 1911.. I don't think anything shoots quite like they do. My favorite form factor hands down.
 
Jan 2010
472
0
Bend, Or.
I agree with pretty much everything stated above. I have a Kimber Custom II w/factory night sights which cost me $850 OTD. I have not had a single issue with it and am sitting around the 1k round mark. It's an awesome shooter as is my Detonics Servicemaster. I only shoot 1911 for pistols even though I still own an xdm40 4.5.
 
May 2011
16
0
MTLK
I was new to the 1911's when I got mine in Nov 2010. Two other friends and I went out and each got one. I got a Para USA GI, Another friend got the Springfield Mil-Spec, and the last got a RIA. All three seem to be built quite well. The Springfield came out of the box flawless while the Para and RIA had FTF issues. Once I switched out the shitty stock Para mags to Tripp I cant get the Para to jamb. The RIA has ran three different mags through it, and still has a FTF here and there when it gets a little dirty. The Springfield was 100% up until this past weekend. He had one Stove pipe, and a couple FTFs. I blame it on limp wristing.

Ive put 1000 rounds through my Para now. Over 700 of those rounds have been 100%. Yes my Para is an entry level 1911, And thats what I bought it for. But its built solid, accurate, and I trust my life with it. Same goes for the Springfield. The RIA on the other hand would be a tinkerer.
 
Feb 2009
126
0
Lacey, Wa
I have to disagree with the premise of the OP's article. Just because you pay XXX more for something does not mean its significantly better.... this is subjective and varies with personal experience and care. As documented in the article there have been multiple quality issues with the aforementioned "premium" brand.

The RIA is a fantastic value based on my personal experience of owning one (I have fired quite a few 1911's). From all the articles/reviews I've read over the years the RIA has maintained excellent manufacturing tolerances and have established a solid reputation. But as common with any other brand there is bound to have issues.

Value+Reliability CAN go hand in hand... thats why I own 4 Rugers. That said I have almost 3 thousand round thru my RIA GI with no FTF using plain ol' chip/mcormick and kimber mags... I love it. Although I wouldn't mind getting a Kimber Pro Carry II.... that thing is badass but for sure i'll be getting one of these SR1911s this year :)

Ruger® SR1911
 
May 2011
1
0
washington state, vantucky
tactical_match_pistol.png

Untitled Document



ROCK ISLAND ARMORY has an excellent 1911 chambered in ACP45 or 9mm
you can almost buy two the price is so competitive & great value
 
Jan 2009
1,684
0
s. greenlake *****
I think the point of the thread is to mention that a 1911 meant for more than plinking targets a few times a year is a serious investment.

I agree.

I love Springfield's, Kimbers, Colts, RIA's etc etc. The point is, the difference between a $450 ria and a $1800 wilson combat/les baer is quite a bit. I'd get a Rock Island, but I'd buy it knowing it was gonna be a project. I'd put different springs, trigger, safties.. etc etc.. as it's lower end you can afford to fuc% around with it.

On the other hand if your leaving for some sandy location tomorrow where bad guys are shooting rockets at you, you don't bring a RIA. You bring a gun that is setup to be bulletproof. In ROUGH conditions (not the box to and from the range)

If you've spent time shooting many different 1911's the fit/finish becomes apparent.

If you've pinched or sliced the fat part of your hand w/the slide or hammer.. you'll know it.

If your gun starts jamming due to a maltuned extractor, or springs that are wearing, you'll know..

If the slide gets loose over time, you'll know.

If your barrel starts wearing on one side because of poor internal alignment, you'll know it.

Boz's point is.. if your going to put thousands of rounds through a gun, get one that is meant for it. OR as others including me have said.. Build it to be meant for it.
 
Nov 2009
463
0
WA
We recently had a very intensive handgun class up here, 2000 rounds in 2 days. One guy showed up with a "custom" RIA and a Taurus 1911 with a rail as his backup. The RIA failed on day one after about 300 rnds. The Taurus lasted a little longer but failed as well. Kinda shitty to waste $700 bones on a class when most of your time and energy is spent trying to get your guns to run correctly or run at all.

I personally own several 1911's. Some were expensive when I bought them and some were relatively inexpensive but to get them all to the point where I would carry them at work, they all cost about the same in the end.

Guys, I'm not bashing on budget priced 1911's, they're great for range toys or nostalgia purposes but if you want a $400 gun to bet your life on, buy a damn Glock. If you want a 1911 for a real life fighting weapon, you generally get what you pay for.
 
Top