![]() |
| | #1 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Washington Posts: 370 | My .45 Debate
So... ... I'm potentially in the market for a .45 (although I still want a P22 and a LCP .380). Here's my predicament: I love the XD series. Beautiful gun and amazing to shoot. On the other hand, I'm looking for something compact that will be easier to conceal than my .40. If I get a compact .45 (in grip only, will still have standard barrel), I'm torn between getting the Glock 30 SF and the XD compact. So for those who have them, care to share your opinion? Side notes: - I compared the Glock 30 and 36, and the 30 fits my hand better by leaps and bounds. - If I get a compact .45, it'll eliminate my desire for a .380, so it would be one less gun to get. |
| Join PNW Guns |
| Welcome to PNW Guns, a gun and firearm community for gun owners in the Pacific Northwest. We welcome everyone and the community is free to join so register today and become part of the PNW Guns family! |
| | #2 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 371 |
glock 29. 45acp vs 10mm is no contest, kinda like comparing an old cb500 honda to a GSXR-1000. Sure the cb500 is kinda cool in a retro sort of way, but nothing like the badassness that is a GSXR-1000. T |
| | #3 | |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Washington Posts: 370 |
So I found this comment about the .45 vs 10mm out on the internet: Quote:
| |
| | #4 |
| Sharpshooter Joined: Jan 2009 From: Renton, WA Posts: 519 |
Kahr PM45 FTMFW 10mm is for guys with small peepee's that need to compensate with their "big gun". ![]() I wouldn't dismiss the .380 idea so quick though. There is no "compact" .45 on the planet that can compare in size/weight concealability as the LCP. I bet my LCP weighs less than a fully loaded clip from a G29/30 lol. I can stick my LCP in a jacket pocket and hardly tell it's there. No way the same could be said for a G30 or similar. Granted a .380 is a much weaker round than a .45 but the little gun you have on you is better than the big gun you left home. So I guess what I'm trying to say is.... buy both! Oh FWIW, if I was in the market for a compact .45 it would be the G30SF or maybe pony up for the Kahr or HK45C. I love the XD series as well, but the G30 is smaller & lighter than the XD .45 Compact with the same capacity. Last edited by GixxerPete; 02-19-2009 at 06:38 PM. |
| | #5 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 371 |
but pete....the LCP can't do you any good when it's at the factory for recall :-p T |
| | #6 |
| Rifleman Joined: Feb 2009 From: Lacey, Wa Posts: 113 | on the Kahr. I handled one for a good bit while waiting for my paperwork to go through this afternoon. It felt tight and well built... slim and sleek as well. I just can't justify spending $700 for one.
|
| | #7 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Washington Posts: 370 |
I watched a guy buy the compact HK today. I about died at the price. No friggin' way. I really loved the feel of the G30 in my hand... |
| | #8 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Jan 2009 From: Thurston County, Washington Posts: 31 |
I recentley added a Taurus M. Pro .45 to my little collection. Shot the other day up in Puyallup and was quite pleased with it. Have an Don Hume IWB holster coming and have been using an Uncle Mikes IWB in the mean time. I'd still like to put a few hundred more rounds through it but for a new firearm I had no problems hittin target, so it will go with me now instead of the P89. |
| | #9 |
| Rifleman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 223 |
45 in anything but a 1911 is sacrilage. I had both a Colt Officer and a Springfield ultra-compact. Both had "issues", most likely due to barrel length. Smallest I would go in a 45 (based on the 2 that I owned that didn't work and the 4 that I had/have that did/do) is a commander sized weapon. If you want smaller than that, go with a G23 or G27. If you're mil or leo/fire you can get one of the Glocks for $410 + the governors fee (with 3 hi-cap mags instead of the normal allotment of 2).
Last edited by Coug91; 02-20-2009 at 08:07 AM. |
| | #10 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 371 |
you should just get the shiny 44mag revolver that I have :-p T |
| | #11 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Washington Posts: 370 | |
| | #12 |
| Rifleman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Ltown, WA Posts: 237 |
love my .44mag revolver, but also love my glock36 .45acp! Still need to get a 1911..
|
| | #13 | |
| Sharpshooter Joined: Jan 2009 From: Renton, WA Posts: 519 | Quote:
| |
| | #14 |
| Rifleman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 223 | |
| | #15 |
| Rifleman Joined: Feb 2009 From: Lacey, Wa Posts: 113 |
Coug what brands of 1911's did you own? I'm looking at getting a 1911 .45 compact... probably another Rock Island Armory. Petey check this mouse gun out Magnum Research Micro Desert Eagle .380 ACP Pocket Pistol I think its better looking than the Kel-... ooops i meant the Ruger :) |
| | #16 | |
| Sharpshooter Joined: Jan 2009 From: Renton, WA Posts: 519 | Quote:
A quick google and it looks like they around around $500 give or take, nearly twice the price of an LCP. Is it twice as good as an LCP? Methinks not. | |
| | #17 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Jan 2009 From: Marysville, WA Posts: 47 |
If you want a .45 you can carry, look for a Kimber Ultra Carry. 3" bbl, single stack, and very concealable. Not horrible to shoot either. Otherwise, I'd skip the .45 as a deep-concealment gun, and get a full size. Much more fun to shoot, and easier to shoot accurately. Stick with 9mm & .380 for the t-shirt & shorts carry. |
| | #18 |
| Rifleman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 223 |
A gunsite built on a Springfield NM frame/slide. My fav with slm grips & tritiium sites Springfield TRP stainless - love the front strap checkering, but the magwell adds about a 1/4" to the bottom length. Tritium night sites S&W 1911PD - that's the commander size one. scandium frame. very light weight easily carried. The Springfields are 5 inchers. |
| | #19 | |
| Gunslinger Joined: Jan 2009 From: wa Posts: 29 |
kimber ultra compact II if you want to look at and feel one let me know. you can fondle mone for a second...... only!!! Quote:
| |
| | #20 | |
| Gunslinger Joined: Feb 2009 From: Oregon Posts: 52 | Quote:
I was going to say that exact same thing...I didn't know how much I would carry/enjoy a lightweight .45, so I picked up a glock 26 (9mm). It's cheap to shoot often (important to be accurate/comfortable with your carry piece) and my wife can shoot it if need be. Someone once razzed me about going with a "wussy" 9mm, I asked him with a straight face if I could shoot him once or twice in the chest with my wussy 9mm. He replied "Hell no, that would probably kill me"...point made! The springfield XD's are terrific weapons and can be concealed relatively easily. Yes, revolvers are the most reliable, but with the knowledge that you'll most likely miss your target in an emergency situation, I want as many rounds as I can carry to up my chances. If only they made a concealable AR-15 I'd be set! | |
| | #21 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Washington Posts: 370 |
I think I'm just gonna call Fed Way and tell them to put me on the Ruger LCP waiting list... *sigh*
|
| | #22 |
| Sharpshooter Joined: Jan 2009 From: Renton, WA Posts: 519 | |
| | #23 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Feb 2009 From: Everett, WA Posts: 94 |
I've got a snub 38 for carrying when I get my Carrying Permit, but am also going to carry a full size 40 cal Glock 22 (I believe it the caliber). I have a full size Ruger P89 9mm, but that is nothing really for me. If I want to carry a 45, I'd just get a subcompact 45 glock as well. Pricey, but easier to take apart and do stuff with in my opinion.
|
| | #24 | |
| Rifleman Joined: Mar 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 106 | Quote:
| |
| | #25 | |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 371 | Quote:
Recoil on my G20 is on par with a 9mm.....ported barrel FTMFW. T | |
| | #26 |
| Moderator Joined: Jan 2009 From: lynnhood Posts: 632 |
hmm I'm a hardcore .45 guy and have been shooting 1911's for the last 25 years (I picked my first one up about 13 years ago) I finally grew to appreciate a polymer framed pistol in the XD platform.. (glock's never fit my hand) Anyway I got a .45 tactical, and can shoot the hell out of it.. I have shot the service in 9mm and .45, as well as subcompact in 9mm and .40. I had heard lots about how snappy the .40's are compared to everything else.. but I didn't notice any real difference.. and the subcompact .40 I shot tore very consistent holes so in my opinion the vicious .40 rumors are just that.. rumors. |
| | #27 |
| Gunslinger Joined: May 2009 From: idaho Posts: 11 |
I'm shooting a Para Ordnance 12.45. I purchased the gun specifically because I have large hands and the double stack fits me much better than a single. I don't carry so I won't really comment much on that other than 12 rounds in a "carry" weapon in .45 should do the trick. I'm certain there are smaller guns out there but when you add round capacity in .45 to the equation you probably won't find anything similiar. It's got a specialized "double action" which I love. Before shooting this gun I would have never even contemplated getting a double action. But it's extremely light and has a definite point during the pull where you can tell it's going to fire. The problem with standard 1911's is that if you are going to carry cocked and loaded you've got an exposed hammer just hanging out the back. I'm sure it could be argued about whether this is safe or not but a lot of law enforcement agencies don't allow you to carry a single action exposed hammer "cocked and locked." The Para Ord LDA can be carried with a round in the chamber on safety and ready to rock without the hammer exposed. Para: Products Page | Para Carry Pistols, handguns, and firearms. New Para Carry Pistols are now available Last edited by maric 57; 06-26-2009 at 09:44 AM. |
| | #28 |
| Moderator Joined: Jan 2009 From: lynnhood Posts: 632 |
that LDA is dead sexy
|
| | #29 |
| Rifleman Joined: Feb 2009 From: redmond,wa Posts: 246 |
Yeah Pete and I both pack lcp's with lasers. Good gun. All rew ones aren't recalled so no worries there
|
| | #30 |
| Rifleman Joined: Sep 2009 From: Poulsbo, WA Posts: 182 |
I've got a CZ75 in 40sw and I bought one of those Colt 1911 reissues(?) (one of 5000) that they made a couple years ago. I always wanted an original 1911 and when I got the chance to get, well, a real one, I couldn't pass it up. But the CZ is the most pleasant handgun I have to shoot. If I were forced to choose one pistol that I had to survive on I guess it would be the CZ but it would be a tough choice over the Super Blackhawk Glad I don't have to decide. Ok If there was a ground war and I had to take a pistol to the field it would be the CZ. If it was a ground war with grizzlies, I'd take the 44 |
| | #31 | |
| Sharpshooter Joined: Jan 2009 From: Renton, WA Posts: 519 | Quote:
(random internet pic) | |
| | #32 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Washington Posts: 370 |
I still haven't purchased a .45 as of yet. I bought an LCP in the interim. :)
|
| | #33 |
| Gunslinger Joined: May 2009 From: Spokane, WA Posts: 39 |
I have the Kahr CW45, and it's a good concealed carry weapon. I'm looking at getting a Glock 10mm, because I need to keep one at home for the young lady. Size.....its an age old debate, but I am a firm believer that there are three ways a round can stop a subject: 1. Rapid Decompression of the Cardiovascular system 2. Loss of Nerve Function 3. So much pain and trauma that the body goes into shock. #1 takes quite a while, even with a major artery hit (3-4 seconds is long enough to empty a 9 round mag or stab someone 7-12 times) #2 is hard to achieve with a standard shot placement So that leaves us with #3. Delivering as many shots as possible in as little time possible to cause enough pain that the body shuts down. Really doesn't matter the caliber at that point. But, it never hurts to have more rounds. :-) |
| | #34 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Oct 2009 From: gilchrist oregon Posts: 66 |
ive got a para 45 warthog for sale 800
|
| | #35 | |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 371 | Quote:
if you want to take a 10mm for a test spin before you buy one let me know and you can borrow my G20. T | |
| | #36 |
| Gunslinger Joined: May 2009 From: Spokane, WA Posts: 39 | Yessir, that would be wonderful. That is what I am looking at buying. I only wish that Glock made a compact version. The sub is tiny, and the full size is a tad bulky for off duty concealment. I'll still have my Kahr though, which is dandy for concealed.
|
| | #37 |
| Marksman Joined: Jan 2009 From: Spokane Posts: 371 |
just let me know when, and let me know what options you want with it lol, the scope lets the accuracy of it show better, but is bulky The ported barrel makes it finicky on ammo accasionally but I can throw the factory barrel in it depending what you want :-) T |
| | #38 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Oct 2009 From: seattle wa Posts: 56 | stopping power
nothing says stop like a 500 s&w |
| | #39 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Sep 2009 From: Seattle, wa Posts: 24 |
I love my Glock 36, it will be my primary carry gun for a long time. ![]() Last edited by rockriver; 11-06-2009 at 08:11 AM. |
| | #40 |
| Gunslinger Joined: Mar 2009 From: Central Washington Posts: 34 |
I'll stay with my kimber 45. It just works every time and works well.
|