PNW Guns Forum
Go Back   PNW Guns > Gun Forum > Pistols

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2009, 08:52 AM   #1
Gunslinger
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 25
Finallllyyy Got Her:)

Well I've been 21 for about 5 months now, but since the ex fiance and I split up I was finally able to go get my CWP and picked up my Springfield XDm 40:). Got it at White Elephant for 589, which is the cheapest place I could find it in Spokane. My CWP isn't here yet so I had to do the 5 day wait or w/e so I won't be able to pick it up till the 30th, but boy I cannot wait to shoot this puppy.
I went with the black and green, don't know why just dig the looks of it.

This is the damage I did with the XDm at sharpshooters. Not to bad for only being the third time I've ever shot a semi-auto pistol. Most my pistol shooting has been with a ruger 44 super red hawk.
 
Join PNW Guns


Welcome to PNW Guns, a gun and firearm community for gun owners in the Pacific Northwest. We welcome everyone and the community is free to join so register today and become part of the PNW Guns family!


Old 03-25-2009, 09:05 AM   #2
Sharpshooter
 
GixxerPete's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Renton, WA
Posts: 519
Nice! Welcome to the XDm club!

I have a 9mm now, and waiting patiently for a .45 version which should be out sometime this summer.
 
Old 03-25-2009, 03:59 PM   #3
Gunslinger
 
thejrod's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Marysville, WA
Posts: 47
A 40?? Ick.... :(



Nice gun tho. :)
 
Old 03-25-2009, 04:08 PM   #4
Sharpshooter
 
FatFugg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Dri-Shities
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejrod View Post
A 40?? Ick.... :(
I never really liked shooting any of the .40's I had fired before I had always preferred .45's, but I really like shooting my XD .40. Why you say .40 is no bueno?
 
Old 03-25-2009, 05:05 PM   #5
Rifleman
 
Coug91's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 223
Nice!!
 
Old 03-25-2009, 07:34 PM   #6
Rifleman
 
WarriorDriver's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Ltown, WA
Posts: 237
I need to try another one of those xd's, I have two glocks and absolutely LOVE them.. but maybe a .40 in an xd to diversify
 
Old 03-25-2009, 08:37 PM   #7
Marksman
 
Metonymy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Washington
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarriorDriver View Post
I need to try another one of those xd's, I have two glocks and absolutely LOVE them.. but maybe a .40 in an xd to diversify
I should have let you shoot mine. Next time we're out...
 
Old 03-25-2009, 08:37 PM   #8
Rifleman
 
WarriorDriver's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Ltown, WA
Posts: 237
ok :)
 
Old 03-25-2009, 08:46 PM   #9
Gunslinger
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 25
Ick on the 40? Better accuracy and ballistics than both a 9 and a 45? Why ick?
 
Old 03-25-2009, 09:47 PM   #10
Rifleman
 
WarriorDriver's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Ltown, WA
Posts: 237
better accuracy? and ballistics? lol Plus you get cool thug factor. haha
 
Old 03-26-2009, 12:30 AM   #11
Gunslinger
 
JohnnyB's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
From: Oregon
Posts: 52
Shoulda bought a glock.





Just kidding, you'll love that pistol. Excellent guns. I don't own one yet (went the glock route) but an XD is on "the list"
 
Old 03-26-2009, 08:05 AM   #12
Sharpshooter
 
GixxerPete's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Renton, WA
Posts: 519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintypoo View Post
Ick on the 40? Better accuracy and ballistics than both a 9 and a 45? Why ick?
Better accuracy? Since when? A 9mm will always be inherintly more accurate in the same gun than a .40 and easier for 99% of people to shoot. Just sayin.

And better ballistics than a .45? Now you're really smoking crack. Not knocking the.40, it's a good round and a nice compromise between the size/capacity of a 9mm and the power of .45 but no way no how is it *more* powerful than a .45, or more accurate than a 9mm.
 
Old 03-26-2009, 09:34 AM   #13
Gunslinger
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 25
I shoot the 40 a hell of a lot better than I do a 9mm I can tell you that much. The 40 S&W and the 45 are neck and neck on their ballistics take a look at the charts. Unless of course the charts are wrong. But hey I can tell you what, if I ever have to use it in self defense, I'll go buy a 45 and shoot the fool once with each and we'll see if he can feel the difference. A 165 grain JHP bullet is shooting at 1150 FPS and has 485 ft lbs of energy out of the 40 S&W, out of the 45 that same bullet is traveling at 1060 Ft Per Second and has 412 Ft Lbs. What part of that is better than the 40? Who's on crack now?
 
Old 03-26-2009, 09:39 AM   #14
Gunslinger
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 25
If you are shooting bigger bullets than the 45 is able to push em better, but I don't shoot heavy bullets at targets, seems like kind of a waste doesn't it? I will be shooting 180 grains for self defense, but I don't even have my gun yet lol. I wish I had a picture of my target with the 40, the one I posted was with the 9mm. It's all about personal preference, just like with bikes haha.
 
Old 03-26-2009, 09:44 AM   #15
Gunslinger
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 25
Johnny, only reason I didn't buy a glock is because it only has the trigger safety. I've heard of guys losing toes from it getting snagged.. I like having the grip safety, and the XD fits my hand like a glove, I've got short hands so the glock grip just didn't feel right. I'm sure someday I'll own a glock 21 10mm, I love Kolats. Then I'd really have the upper hand on 45's lol
 
Old 03-26-2009, 10:06 AM   #16
Rifleman
 
WarriorDriver's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Ltown, WA
Posts: 237
pull the trigger the gun goes boom, imagine that, haha. I have two glocks, and carry one in a .45, but understand some peoples need for extra safetys, personal preference.
 
Old 03-26-2009, 10:57 AM   #17
Gunslinger
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 25
That's what it comes down to. Personal preference
 
Old 03-26-2009, 12:16 PM   #18
Rifleman
 
Coug91's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Spokane
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintypoo View Post
That's what it comes down to. Personal preference
I like Glocks and 1911's. XD - maybe someday. Just a matter of preferences and priorities.
 
Old 03-26-2009, 03:09 PM   #19
Sharpshooter
 
GixxerPete's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Renton, WA
Posts: 519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintypoo View Post
I shoot the 40 a hell of a lot better than I do a 9mm I can tell you that much. The 40 S&W and the 45 are neck and neck on their ballistics take a look at the charts. Unless of course the charts are wrong. But hey I can tell you what, if I ever have to use it in self defense, I'll go buy a 45 and shoot the fool once with each and we'll see if he can feel the difference. A 165 grain JHP bullet is shooting at 1150 FPS and has 485 ft lbs of energy out of the 40 S&W, out of the 45 that same bullet is traveling at 1060 Ft Per Second and has 412 Ft Lbs. What part of that is better than the 40? Who's on crack now?
Still you with the crack pipe.

I certainly wouldn't consider myself a ballistics expert by any means, but this is definitely the first time I've ever heard of a .40 being more powerful than a .45? If I was gonna shoot a 165 grain .45 it would be a +P at 1250 fps and 573 ft/lbs. Kinda blows that .40 out of the water, eh? What's more telling is the 50 yard muzzle energy. The .40 rounds drop off significantly vs their muzzle energy, while the heavier .45 rounds retain a lot more energy. FWIW I only use 230 grain rounds in FMJ or JHP.

That said, I argue enough about stupid shit on PNW, I'm not gonna do it here about calibers. If the .40 works better for *you* that's all that really matters. Personally I wouldn't wanna get shot with either.
 
Old 03-26-2009, 03:11 PM   #20
Sharpshooter
 
GixxerPete's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Renton, WA
Posts: 519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintypoo View Post
If you are shooting bigger bullets than the 45 is able to push em better, but I don't shoot heavy bullets at targets, seems like kind of a waste doesn't it? I will be shooting 180 grains for self defense, but I don't even have my gun yet lol. I wish I had a picture of my target with the 40, the one I posted was with the 9mm. It's all about personal preference, just like with bikes haha.
Waste of what, lead? LOL I try to use the same weight target round as defense round if possible, so they shoot/feel closer to same. That's easy with .45 as I use 230 grain for everything. In my 9mm's I use 124 grain +P defense rounds, but 124 grain FMJs are somewhat hard to come by, but 115 grain is everywhere so I just use that.
 
Old 03-26-2009, 03:15 PM   #21
Sharpshooter
 
GixxerPete's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Renton, WA
Posts: 519
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarriorDriver View Post
pull the trigger the gun goes boom, imagine that, haha. I have two glocks, and carry one in a .45, but understand some peoples need for extra safetys, personal preference.
I've had a Glock for almost 20 years and never felt it was "unsafe" or needed any extra safeties. Keep your finger off the trigger and will not go bang. That said, I do like the grip safety on the XDs, it's not even noticeable to the shooter, and does add a small degree of safety. The big thing for me is the ergonomics. The XDs just fit my hand better, and I find the 1911 grip angle to point more naturally for me.
 
Reply

  PNW Guns > Gun Forum > Pistols


Thread Tools
Display Modes



Facebook @pnwguns PNW Guns RSS Feed

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2009 - 2010 PNW Guns. All rights reserved.